Living in an Augmented Reality

Thoughts on AR, technology and anything else I feel compelled to talk about
  • rss
  • Home
  • About

“Jigsaw Live: AR Puzzle” … let the silly AR apps continue

blair | May 1, 2010

I was looking at the video of this app, “Jigsaw Live,” as I look at most potentially interesting AR apps.  On the surface, it sounds interesting:  ” an AR jigsaw puzzle.”   I’ve been interested in making AR jigsaw puzzles for a while (heck, I even went to the extreme of sending mail to my favorite puzzle company, Stave, to see if I could interest them, to no avail).  But, to me, the concept is about augmenting a puzzle.

After all, AR apps really need to have two components: reality + augmenting.  If reality doesn’t really matter, than why bother with making it an AR app (for example, holding up the phone in this app to solve the “puzzle” is tiring, as it is with any app that requires you to hold the phone up for a period of time).  And, you need to augment the reality in some way … right?  Bring these two things together, and then add something fun, exciting, engaging or useful.

So, let’s consider this app, then.

They have reality, you might say. It’s live video on the puzzle pieces, so that’s reality, right … or, is it?  Does reality matter? Not really, actually.  It’s just video.  Looking at something different doesn’t change the puzzle, nor affect the program.  Reality is “just a texture” … it could be a video or image from you camera roll, and it wouldn’t really change things.  The live video is cool at first;  but, in the end, it’s just a gimmick.

Going further, do they “augment” it?  No.  Their “reality” (the video texture) augments their puzzle, but reality isn’t augmented, nothing is moved out into the world, nothing about the world around you is enhanced.

Perhaps the title “Jigsaw Live:  Augmented Puzzle” would be a more accurate title?  I think so.   Unfortunately, even the puzzle doesn’t look that interesting.  Square pieces?  Up to 100?  For $2.99?  Yikes!  I would have bought this and played with it if it was $0.99, since I’ll pretty much buy any potentially interesting app for that.  But, for $3, you have to do better!    The “ultimate in puzzle fun” (to quote their page)?  Really?  One wonders if the authors even played a puzzle (a real one, not one of those 4×4 square slider puzzles, or the cornucopia of lame flash puzzles).

Ah well, another good app name taken.

I’m including their video here, so you can look at it now, and draw your own conclusions.  What do folks think … am I being too critical?

YouTube Preview Image
Categories
commercial, games
Tags
iphone, puzzle, video
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Clever use of AR for public safety awareness How will people play augmented board or card games? »

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

May 2010
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Archives

  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • September 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008

Categories

  • art
  • aurainteractive
  • commercial
  • demos
  • displays
  • education
  • games
  • gdc
  • ismar
  • magicbook
  • musings
  • personal
  • rwww
  • santavision
  • serious

Tags

advertising architectural art art authoring blair bogost cards dna flartoolkit flash fun games gdc geotagging geovector german gizmondo gps handheld ar hype iphone ismar metaio mobile nintendo nokia overview predictions prototype pubs real-world wide web social media spore sterling tegra tex sucks topps total immersion translation virtual pet virtual worlds vr vuzix year end zombies

Pages

  • About

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox
Podcast Powered by podPress (v8.8)